IPO Accounting — Share Issue Expenses
Why the tens of crores a company spends on investment bankers, lawyers, and printing costs to go public never actually shows up as an 'expense' reducing its reported profit.
In plain English
Imagine a company spends ₹50 crore on merchant banker fees, legal costs, printing, marketing, and stock exchange fees, all in the process of taking itself public through an Initial Public Offering (IPO). This is real money genuinely spent, and in almost any other context, a cost like this would be expensed in the P&L, reducing reported profit. But share issue expenses get a very different, specific treatment: rather than reducing profit, they're netted directly against the SECURITIES PREMIUM the company raises from selling new shares — meaning this substantial cost never touches the P&L at all, and instead simply reduces how much of the new capital raised actually ends up permanently boosting the company's equity.
Words you'll need first
The amount a company receives for issuing shares ABOVE their face (nominal) value — if a company with ₹10 face-value shares issues new shares to IPO investors at ₹900 each, ₹10 goes to Share Capital and the remaining ₹890 per share goes to Securities Premium, a distinct reserve within Shareholders' Equity. Ind AS 32 specifically permits certain costs directly attributable to issuing those shares to be adjusted against this Securities Premium, rather than expensed through the P&L.
An IPO can consist of a Fresh Issue (the company itself issues brand-new shares and receives the proceeds, genuinely raising new capital) and/or an Offer for Sale, or OFS (EXISTING shareholders sell some of their OWN already-held shares to the public, with proceeds going to THEM, not the company). Share issue expenses relating to the Fresh Issue are typically borne by, and adjusted against the securities premium of, the company itself; expenses relating to the OFS portion are more typically for the selling shareholders to bear.
A worked example, with numbers
| Item | ₹ crore |
|---|---|
| Gross proceeds from the Fresh Issue | 1,000 |
| Of which: Share Capital (face value portion) | ≈20 |
| Of which: Securities Premium (before expenses) | ≈980 |
| Less: Share issue expenses (adjusted against Securities Premium) | (40) |
| Net Securities Premium added to Equity | ≈940 |
- None of the ₹40 crore in genuine, real merchant banking, legal, and marketing costs hits the P&L as an expense — the company's reported net profit for the IPO year is completely unaffected by this substantial cash cost.
- Instead, the ₹40 crore simply reduces the amount of Securities Premium that ultimately ends up boosting Shareholders' Equity — the company still receives the full ₹1,000 crore in cash, but only about ₹960 crore genuinely, permanently strengthens equity once transaction costs are accounted for.
- This treatment reflects a specific accounting view: share issue expenses are considered a direct COST OF RAISING CAPITAL, a cost of the transaction with the company's own owners, rather than an operating expense of running the underlying business.
- This is exactly why a company's reported profit in the year of a large IPO doesn't show any specific drag from these substantial transaction costs — a reader interested in a company's true, all-in cost of accessing capital markets needs to look at the Statement of Changes in Equity, not the P&L.
What it does to the financial statements
Impact on the P&L
- Share issue expenses relating to the company's own Fresh Issue proceeds are adjusted against Securities Premium, NOT expensed through the P&L — a company's reported profit in an IPO year is unaffected by these substantial, real transaction costs.
- If a company's Securities Premium reserve is insufficient to absorb the full share issue expense, the excess would need to be expensed through the P&L instead, since the netting-off treatment can only go as far as the available premium.
- Costs specifically relating to an Offer for Sale component of an IPO are generally the responsibility of the selling shareholders, not the listed company itself — the company's own financial statements wouldn't reflect these costs at all.
- This accounting treatment means IPO-related transaction costs never appear as a distinct, visible expense line — genuinely understanding a company's all-in cost of a public offering requires checking specific disclosures in the notes, not scanning the P&L.
Impact on the Balance Sheet
- Share issue expenses directly reduce the Securities Premium account within Shareholders' Equity — a real, if less visible, reduction in the net capital genuinely added to the company's equity base.
- The company's cash balance increases by the FULL gross proceeds received, while expenses paid in cash reduce cash directly while ALSO reducing the equity-side Securities Premium, keeping the balance sheet in balance.
- A company undertaking a large IPO shows a substantial jump in both Cash and Shareholders' Equity — one of the most visible, immediate balance sheet transformations any company undergoes.
- For a PURE Offer for Sale IPO, the company's own balance sheet doesn't change in terms of cash or equity raised at all — only its shareholder register and market listing status change.
Which standard covers this
In India, the netting of share issue expenses against Securities Premium is governed by the general transaction cost principles within Ind AS 32 – Financial Instruments: Presentation, while the IPO PROCESS itself is separately governed by SEBI's Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements (ICDR) Regulations.
How it's recognised globally
Globally, the equivalent transaction-cost principle sits within IAS 32, and Ind AS 32 mirrors its approach of netting directly attributable share issue costs against the equity proceeds raised, rather than expensing them, closely. Under US GAAP, broadly similar treatment applies — direct, incremental costs of a securities offering are typically deducted from the gross proceeds recorded in equity, following guidance including ASC 340-10 and related SEC staff guidance — a reasonably well-converged principle across Indian, IFRS and US GAAP practice.
Real example — Indian listed company
The IPO of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) in May 2022 remains India's largest-ever public offering, raising approximately ₹21,000 crore, and offers a genuinely instructive real-world nuance on the fresh-issue-versus-OFS distinction this article describes. The LIC IPO was structured almost entirely as an Offer for Sale by its majority shareholder, the Government of India, selling a 3.5% stake to public investors, rather than as a Fresh Issue where LIC itself would raise new capital — meaning the substantial IPO proceeds flowed to the Government of India as the selling shareholder, not to LIC's own balance sheet as fresh capital. This structure is a useful, concrete illustration of exactly the distinction this article draws: while LIC as a company underwent the full IPO process — listing on stock exchanges, and bearing certain process-related costs required of a newly-listed entity — the underlying economics of who actually received the ₹21,000 crore raised followed the OFS structure this article describes, rather than the Fresh Issue pattern that would have seen the proceeds and the associated share-issue-expense-netting treatment flow through LIC's own equity accounts.
Where you'll see this
Related concepts
Operating Leverage
Why a 10% jump in a company's sales can sometimes turn into an 80% jump in its profit — and why the same 10% drop can be brutal for the exact same reason.
Financial Leverage
Why borrowing money can make a company's returns to shareholders look spectacular in a good year — and why the exact same borrowing can wipe shareholders out in a bad one.
Return on Capital Employed (ROCE)
Why a company that borrows heavily to boost its Return on Equity can still be a genuinely mediocre business underneath — and why ROCE is the number that catches what ROE alone can hide.